Skip to content
Guardianship law has traditionally dealt with the management of tangible property, healthcare decisions, housing, and finances. But as more of our lives migrate online, new questions arise. What happens to your digital identity if you’re placed under guardianship? Can a guardian access your emails, edit or delete your social media, or take control of your digital assets?
These questions are no longer theoretical. In an age where personal expression, financial management, and even professional presence are maintained through platforms like Instagram, TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), and email, the legal system is being forced to consider how guardianship extends into the virtual world.
In Texas, the answer is nuanced. While traditional guardianship focuses on physical and financial well-being, the law has been adapting to include digital life. And the implications are serious. When someone is deemed legally incapacitated, their online world might be one of the first places to change. It should be noted that this might sometimes be done without their consent.
This article explores the evolving nature of digital guardianship in Texas, what rights a guardian has over social media and digital accounts, and how the law is trying to balance autonomy, safety, and privacy in a virtual world that doesn’t always play by traditional legal rules.
Understanding Guardianship in the Traditional Sense
In Texas, a guardianship is a court-ordered relationship where one person (the guardian) is authorized to make decisions for another person (the ward). This ward is usually found legally incapable of managing their personal affairs. The law divides guardianship into two primary categories: guardian of the person and guardian of the estate.
A guardian of the person handles personal and medical decisions. This includes where the ward lives, what care they receive, and how their daily needs are met. A guardian of the estate manages financial matters, including investments, property, and debts.
Traditionally, that’s where the boundaries lie. But as technology evolves, personal and financial decisions are no longer limited to paper statements or in-person transactions. Your entire world—identity, relationships, finances, and voice—can be stored behind a username and password.
So, where does the law stand when it comes to who controls that digital life?
What Are Digital Assets, Legally Speaking?
Texas law now recognizes that digital accounts and content are assets in their own right. This includes everything from email and cloud storage to social media profiles, cryptocurrency, online banking, photo libraries, e-commerce platforms, and even video game characters.
In 2017, Texas adopted the Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA). This gives guardians and other fiduciaries certain rights to access a ward’s digital assets—but only under specific conditions. RUFADAA was created in response to the growing number of disputes over digital access, especially after a person dies or becomes incapacitated without a digital estate plan.
Under this law, guardians in Texas can request access to digital assets—but they must be granted authority to do so either by the court or by the ward’s prior authorization in a will, trust, or legal document. The law also recognizes a difference between content and the catalogue of digital communications. Content includes the substance of emails or messages, while a catalogue refers to the sender, recipient, and date of those communications.
That distinction matters. Without explicit permission, a guardian may be able to see that a ward emailed someone, but not what was said. This line helps protect privacy while still allowing oversight.
Can a Guardian Access or Delete Your Social Media Accounts?
The short answer: it depends.
Texas courts may authorize a guardian to manage a ward’s digital accounts if it’s deemed in the best interest of the ward and if there’s a clear need to intervene. However, social media accounts are often governed by the terms of service of the platform, not just state law.
Many social media companies have their procedures for handling incapacitated users. Facebook, for instance, allows for accounts to be memorialized or deleted, but generally requires documentation and proof of legal authority. Instagram follows a similar policy. TikTok and other platforms may deny access outright unless the court order is specific.
This means that even if a Texas court grants a guardian control over a ward’s digital assets, the guardian may still face resistance from tech companies. And without proper planning or prior authorization, they may find themselves unable to log in, change passwords, or deactivate accounts.
In some cases, guardians have used their authority to monitor or limit a ward’s social media use. This is particularly if there are concerns about scams, self-harm, or exploitation. While intended as a protective measure, this power walks a fine line between safety and censorship.
The Risks of Social Media Control Under Guardianship
There is a troubling potential for abuse when someone gains control over another’s voice online. Social media isn’t just a place to post selfies or follow trends. It’s a platform for expression, protest, connection, and self-representation.
When a guardian assumes control of a ward’s online presence, several ethical and legal risks emerge:
Silencing the Ward
If a guardian deletes posts, disables comments, or restricts who the ward can interact with, they may inadvertently—or intentionally—cut the ward off from their support system. This can be especially damaging for wards who are already isolated or struggling with mental health challenges.
Public Misrepresentation
Guardians who post or manage content on behalf of the ward may do so in ways that don’t reflect the ward’s personality, wishes, or identity. This can harm the ward’s reputation or create confusion among friends, family, or employers.
Loss of Digital Legacy
Photos, writings, artwork, or videos shared online often form part of a person’s digital legacy. If a guardian deletes or modifies that content, years of memories and creative work may be lost permanently.
Conflicts of Interest
If the guardian is also a relative, ex-spouse, or former business partner, controlling social media may present a conflict, especially in situations where the ward has accused the guardian of wrongdoing or the parties have a contentious history.
These concerns highlight the importance of oversight and clear legal limits when it comes to digital control.
What Does the Court Consider Before Granting Digital Powers?
Courts in Texas are increasingly aware of the digital dimensions of guardianship. When reviewing a request to manage or access digital assets, judges consider several key questions:
- Does the guardian need access to the account to protect the ward from harm?
- Has the ward previously granted consent to share or transfer account access?
- Is there a less restrictive alternative to full control, such as monitoring or temporary access?
- Will the guardian’s access violate the terms of service of the platform?
If the court finds that the ward’s digital life is central to their well-being—especially if social media is a form of therapy, support, or communication—it may impose limits to ensure the ward retains as much autonomy as possible.
Guardians must also report their actions to the court in annual updates. If their management of digital accounts appears excessive or unnecessary, they can be investigated or removed.
Planning Ahead: Digital Powers of Attorney and Advance Directives
One of the best ways to avoid digital guardianship disputes is by planning. Texas residents can include digital asset instructions in their durable powers of attorney, medical directives, or estate plans. These instructions can specify who should manage social media accounts, what should happen to stored photos, and whether accounts should be deleted or preserved.
Tools like password managers, cloud storage, and digital legacy planning apps also help ensure that important content isn’t lost. More importantly, they allow individuals to retain control over how their digital lives are handled, rather than leaving those decisions to the courts.
For those who are already under guardianship, it’s still possible to assert digital preferences through supported decision-making agreements, family mediation, or by working with legal advocates to review or modify the guardian’s powers.
Can a Ward Challenge Their Guardian’s Digital Control?
Yes. In Texas, wards have rights—even under guardianship. If a ward believes their guardian is unfairly censoring them, mismanaging their digital property, or invading their privacy, they can file a motion with the court to request a review or modification of the guardianship order.
The court may appoint an attorney ad litem to represent the ward and investigate the allegations. If the guardian is found to be overstepping or acting against the ward’s best interest, the court can limit their powers, issue warnings, or appoint a new guardian altogether.
Wards can also petition to restore their rights if their capacity improves. Restoration doesn’t have to be all or nothing. In some cases, courts may grant partial restoration, allowing wards to manage specific aspects of their lives—such as their digital identity—while retaining guardianship over other areas.
Conclusion
As our lives move deeper into the digital world, guardianship law in Texas must continue evolving to address how personal identity, autonomy, and protection intersect online. While the law allows guardians to request control over digital assets, this power must be exercised with extreme caution and under judicial oversight.
For individuals concerned about who will manage their social media, email, or cloud accounts if they become incapacitated, the best defense is a good plan. Through digital directives and legal tools like durable powers of attorney, Texans can ensure their virtual voice remains in trusted hands. Because in today’s world, protecting someone’s best interest doesn’t end at their front door—it extends to every password, post, and profile that defines who they are.
